Who Controls The World?
Originally posted to iFunny on 11/24/2022 (Modified with recent events) [Oct 10, 2023]
Many RWers often get caught up in semantics over the JQ. Namely, do they literally control/influence everything or do they control most/a lot, but not everything. Frankly, the more rational side of the argument is that they control a substantial amount but not all, simply because it is not feasible for any singular group to exert total control of global events.
That being said, people are generally quite bad at communicating the nuances. I don’t believe their are people who genuinely think that Jews are personally responsible for all of the bad things facing the world, but they often fail to communicate the nuances of their belief. Similarly, those who argue against the idea that Jews control everything often come off as downplaying their influence or even as a straight up philosemite.
Nonetheless, these discussions are vital to RW discourse, because we need to have a clear notion of what we face before we openly discuss it. We cannot simply blindly lash out against “da Joos” otherwise we will flop, again and again. But I already discussed this in another post so I won’t repeat myself here.
Instead, I will provide examples of interest groups outside of Jewish influence, as well as the dialectical importance of refuting the notion of the “Jewish Panopticon” as I like to call it, or really any sort of Panopticon.
What Do (((They))) Control?
First, Jews control the banks. This gives them economic control over nations that bank with them. Second, is their control over the legislature and the presidential cabinet.1 Finally, they control the media and Hollywood. This gives them a lot of control, especially in the Western World, but it is far from total.
Their banking control, while extensive in the West, isn’t complete though. For example, China operates almost entirely outside of Jewish baking influence, alongside Russia. This has been a fairly successful venture for them (though it will inevitably collapse, but this is more due to the rampant speculation crises in China than flaws in their banking system) and could serve as a decent model of the US in the future. It’s also important to remember that Nazi Germany literally just said they weren’t going to bank with Jews anymore, and it kinda worked. The only way for international banks to actually collect on their loans is for them to ”levy the international community” (grovel to the Anglosphere) into declaring war on the non-compliant country. In WW2 this was the French and British, and eventually the US. If the US did it today, it would be nobody since the US is more than powerful enough to hold its own. In WW2, the British and French were enough to pose a legitimate threat to the Nazis, but nowadays the only country that could pose even a slight threat to the US is China, who are much weaker than people realize and have poor relations with Israel and “da Joos” anyways.
Jewish influence over the government is certainly quite pervasive, but also all they really do is make us blow up Arabs and shell out billions to Israel. Every so often we get the legal equivalent of a nuclear warhead (Hart-Celler comes to mind), but this wouldn’t be possible without the media. We’d probably be shelling Arabs regardless because it’s in our interest to maintain a presence in the ME due to the oil reserves anyways. Shelling out billions in aid to Israel is annoying and I’d rather we stop, but it isn’t the end of the world. The US has a powerful economy and ultimately Israeli aid is a drop in the bucket, especially compared to African aid (Wakanda forever). They also have a tendency to ignore state and local governments (aside from key cities like NYC) in favor of federal positions. This does give them more influence overall, but it exposes a critical weakness in their power structure which can be exploited.
Jewish control over Hollywood and the mainstream media is undoubtedly their most powerful asset. It’s allowed them to shape the hearts and minds of hundreds of millions of Americans, and the result is quite poignant. The handful of Jews in the legislature will, alongside the brainwashed gentiles, capitalize on this in order to pass harmful legislation but I would consider this more of a function of media control than I would legislative control. Anyways, this control is also waning. In their conquest of American political discourse, Jews created too many political groups and it’s come back to bite them. Neo-Cons, Progressive Liberals, Marxists, and minority groups like BLM or the LGBT+ all exist as their own distinct entities and often clash with Jewish interests. Leftist organizations in particular have become quite difficult for Jews to control, as their “anti-imperialist” rhetoric has been lobbed at Israel and many Progressives have become sympathetic to Palestine. MSM in general is also taking a nosedive, with CNN having been on a consistent decline for years now and Fox’s profits tanking following Tucker Carlson leaving. The Chinese are currently running circles around the Jews on social media. Through TikTok, the Chinese are basically lobotomizing American youth (not to mention the security concern).2 Jews used to have something similar with Twitter, but recent surges in “antisemitism” against the ADL on Twitter have mitigated their gains.3
What Don’t (((They))) Control?
As I mentioned earlier, their influence over social media is waning, partially because of the recent scandals with Twitter and the ADL, and partially because China is really starting to dominate the market with TikTok.
I would also argue that the military isn’t really under their control, rather its interests usually align with those of Israel. For example, NATO was formed specifically to contain the Soviet Union, the single strongest bastion of international Jewery for most of the 20th century. I can’t see any reason why Jews would want to hamper Soviet efforts because, unlike the World Wars, you can’t argue that it served to weaken White nations since there was never direct conflict and NATO members were strengthened more than anything (whether that remains true today is debatable).
Other organizations like AUKUS or ANZUS only serve to contain China, which you could argue is in the interest of Jews but it is also clearly in the interest of Whites. Five Eyes certainly serves as a valuable asset to Israel, insofar as global intelligence is invaluable to everyone.
Earlier I alluded to the fact that the US would maintain a presence in the Middle East regardless of Israel’s presence. This is due to our need to maintain control of their oil reserves so that we can maintain strategic reserves in the US. If we were to ever go to war with China, their first move would be to kick us out of the Middle East and, if they were to succeed, we would need to resort to American (North or South) reserves to fuel our military and economy. This is why Venezuela is never allowed to tap in to their rich oil reserves; because we want to get them for emergency use. For this reason, keeping Israel around does at least serve to justify our presence in the Middle East and is therefore symbiotic. Certainly, you can argue that Israel gets more out of the relationship (I don’t think I would actually agree though), but the US still has a vested interest in keeping a presence in the Middle East.
Deconstructing The Panopticon
I think it’s critical to remember that Jews are not omniscient. They routinely fail in their efforts. The ADL was too blunt and is now catching flak for it. Antisemitic rhetoric is brought to the mainstream fairly frequently, as happened with Kanye, and people are often surprisingly receptive of this. Mossad completely failed to predict the recent Hamas attacks. Often times, when the Jews set up organizations to destabilize the West, these organizations will themselves turn on Israel and the Jews (more on that later).
It’s important to remember that it is entirely impossible to exercise complete control over the world, both from a logistical and technological viewpoint. People are too fickle to control forever and you will always have competing groups vying for influence. Technology can be defeated by bad weather or lasers. It is crucial to remember this; defeatism is the single most powerful tool in the Jewish arsenal.
Other Groups Of Interest
I mentioned earlier that, in their efforts to destabilize the West, Jews set up or co-opted a number of organizations to assist them. The American conservative scene was replaced with Neoconservatives who would be less likely to resist Israel. Progressive liberals were influenced to open the floodgates of immigration. Marxism was created to destroy the imperial ambitions of Western countries.
But these groups have also become something of a problem for the Jews, particularly in regard to Israel. Despite all their flaws, Neocons have become increasingly resistant to globalism and the WEF. Progressives decry the mistreatment of Palestinians in Israel while Marxists advocate for the dismantling of the “Israeli Empire” in the Middle East.
China presents a unique threat to Jewish hegemony, as their are relatively powerful nation that is almost completely free from Jewish influence. Banking is done in-house, China is driven by ethnocentrism (despite its Marxist roots), and China has consistently supported Hamas over the past decades.
Third world countries also almost universally hate Israel, particularly the closer to Israel they actually are. The recent Hamas attack on Israel has received widespread support from surrounding nations. While these nations don’t really have any ability to deter international Jewery, they can and do pose a very real threat to Israel. It should be noted, however, that these groups should not be treated as allies. If they can destroy Israel, they will come for the West next.
Conclusion
Remember the following:
Jews do not control everything.
Jews are not omniscient.
There are other groups that are always vying for influence as well.
Most of the aforementioned groups are not your friends either.
And most importantly:
Mearsheimer, John J. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York City: Farrar, Straus and Giroux). Archive.org.