While I was looking forward to reading this article, I was expecting it to be more stereotypically white supremacist, hence why I am shocked that your opinions are surprisingly similar to my opinions. I still almost can't believe how similar we think.
Modern day slavery is dishonest, spread out, (landlord, government taxes - even if you leave the country, employers with so much weight). And then its all distant and impersonal.
Even into the early 1900s most of the middle class had servants. They effectively made more than low wage equivalents today.
What happens when your live in servant has a problem? Are you human? Do you care?
We outsourced, What happens when the random "peer" of you at McDonald's has a problem? Do you care? Not really.
Personal slavery is a human institution for humans, by humans.
Distant masters and hired overseers is more corporate slavery than human slavery, and now all are in corporate slavery.
Any sense of modern government running slaves, is going to be corporate slavery. And going to lose the true benefits of slavery.
Slaves, servants or something in that genre, are members of a household. They become similar to your mention, the child. Not all though are naive, through various circumstances slavery should have its way out. The good slaves who climb up etc.
In modern times you're told you have arrived from birth, the run down apartment dwellers working at McDonald's are told they are fully = the POTUS. What freedom is there to strive for? What path to a greater status needs followed? There is no real answer.
An honest system would allow people to know what they strive for. I'm maybe more for Serfs, Peasants, and "Kulaks" (Gentry?) Perhaps than the most formal slaves.
But all something in between, there are times when slaves could own slaves, slave-ception. Surely, a estate owning, slave owning slave is far > than the supposedly = POTUS McDonald's Apartment eviction king?
Give them a route to know what they are and when they are more.
Even the things like voting, landowners aka stake holders vs sub slaves. As the McDonald's worker in this is beneath a slave in many cultures, in many cases. Yet he sort of rules you? What is that but a broken society?
I would like to see you enslaved in an El Salvadoran prison and all of your human rights violated. It would be great research for future trash pieces you write.
Surprisingly well written. Not the typical white supremacist talking points, but a rather nuanced, philosophy driven take on the topic. Though, of course, I disagree with your racial positions on principle.
While I was looking forward to reading this article, I was expecting it to be more stereotypically white supremacist, hence why I am shocked that your opinions are surprisingly similar to my opinions. I still almost can't believe how similar we think.
Was expecting an article about slave raids & harems.
Got something only a lawyer would write.
Lol
I was giddy with excitement that you didn't paywall this article like you did last time.
You could read it free under Arditi as part of the sample article
I thought it was paywalled?
Arditi was subscription based but you could read a free article as a sample. A lot of the iFunniers used their free article on mine.
I would be so judicious with my silver bullet that I probably wouldn't use it kek
Modern day slavery is dishonest, spread out, (landlord, government taxes - even if you leave the country, employers with so much weight). And then its all distant and impersonal.
Even into the early 1900s most of the middle class had servants. They effectively made more than low wage equivalents today.
What happens when your live in servant has a problem? Are you human? Do you care?
We outsourced, What happens when the random "peer" of you at McDonald's has a problem? Do you care? Not really.
Personal slavery is a human institution for humans, by humans.
Distant masters and hired overseers is more corporate slavery than human slavery, and now all are in corporate slavery.
Any sense of modern government running slaves, is going to be corporate slavery. And going to lose the true benefits of slavery.
Slaves, servants or something in that genre, are members of a household. They become similar to your mention, the child. Not all though are naive, through various circumstances slavery should have its way out. The good slaves who climb up etc.
In modern times you're told you have arrived from birth, the run down apartment dwellers working at McDonald's are told they are fully = the POTUS. What freedom is there to strive for? What path to a greater status needs followed? There is no real answer.
An honest system would allow people to know what they strive for. I'm maybe more for Serfs, Peasants, and "Kulaks" (Gentry?) Perhaps than the most formal slaves.
But all something in between, there are times when slaves could own slaves, slave-ception. Surely, a estate owning, slave owning slave is far > than the supposedly = POTUS McDonald's Apartment eviction king?
Give them a route to know what they are and when they are more.
Even the things like voting, landowners aka stake holders vs sub slaves. As the McDonald's worker in this is beneath a slave in many cultures, in many cases. Yet he sort of rules you? What is that but a broken society?
Bit late for this article but an enjoyable and sober read well structured and well written.
10/10 idea.
I would like to see you enslaved in an El Salvadoran prison and all of your human rights violated. It would be great research for future trash pieces you write.
So do you believe in human rights or no? Are human rights procedural, or substantive? What exactly are human rights?
Surprisingly well written. Not the typical white supremacist talking points, but a rather nuanced, philosophy driven take on the topic. Though, of course, I disagree with your racial positions on principle.
That's because you're a nigger.
Lmao.